Natural Conservation Based on Religious, Universal and Traditional Knowledge

05.20 Unknown 1 Comments

The attempt of natural conservation has strength opportunity to sustain the continuity of traditional knowledge in balancing with universal knowledge should be based on spiritual/religious motive. The comprehensive effort of natural preservation can not be separated from economic, social, and politic issues. So, the religious and traditional framework will be an important instrument to natural conservation. Even the challenge also founded in the religious realm, but hopefully the awareness of theological teaching on nature especially as a balancing of cosmology will become an observed consideration.
How to preserve turtle, eagle, natural food bunch, climate, water, forest and other will be so difficult in the trapping of the capitalistic system. Technology and science do not mean the only cause of distraction of nature. Such as Scott told of “one of the obstacles to this engagement, however, is the rapid rate of cultural change and modernization in Malaysia, especially between 1980 and 2011, which has replaced many local customary property regimes with statist and capitalist approaches to resource harvesting, consumption, and wealth accumulation (Scott 1969)”
The aim of scientific knowledge to ‘control’ nature in order to get ‘advantage’ especially for big production in transferring it to capitalistic values that are the most caused by crisis in environmental balance. In the same time, this is also ‘crisis spiritual’ as human life.
So, I agree as Michael Northcott noted from Rappaport that “a postmodern hybrid between local and universal knowledge, traditional ritual and conservation practice in which conservation practices are the occasion for new partnerships between traditional rituals and customary relationships and ecosystem science (Rappaport 1999: 456-59/2012, p. 3)
As Chan Eng Heng’s experience that has spiritual motive in her effort of turtle conservation will make her have a strong power of believe and practice. She revealed about “a sense of divine support for her work, as well as to her ability to engage the traditional religious beliefs of her supporters in the sacred status of turtles”. From her person effort become actor-network of conservation scientists, religionists, local communities. Need one can motivate and convince people for the important of natural sustainability.  
Matthew H. Amster also includes traditional knowledge as an instrument for “the nature of dialogue” by resacralization of aspects of nature in a Christian idiom (2008, p. 76). He explained how “traditional beliefs and environmental engagements in the post-Christian conversion era.” Mainly how religious beliefs and practices have positioned, and continue to reposition, the Kelabit vis-à-vis the natural world.

The question is how if there are any contradicted elements of local and universal knowledge, even so in ritual practices for maintaining ritual conservations? 

You Might Also Like

1 komentar: